麻豆传媒入口

Social & Emotional Learning (SEL)

Tips for Teaching Realistic Optimism

Some simple strategies can help students reframe challenges as opportunities for growth.

March 19, 2019

Your content has been saved!

Go to My Saved Content.
漏颈厂迟辞肠办/叠别苍箩补惫颈蝉补

Optimism is more than positive thinking; it鈥檚 a way to combat learned helplessness that is created when one approaches a challenge with a defeated mindset.聽

Students manifesting learned helplessness refuse to engage in any effort that could lead to improved outcomes, even if these ways are available, obvious, and easy. Learned helplessness may lead to action paralysis. In contrast, optimism frames negative events as springboards to favorable outcomes. 聽

Realistic optimism should be the educator鈥檚 goal. Realistic optimists recognize reality constraints and aspire to probable outcomes. They see the path to success as full of twists and turns. Consequently, they are not risk-averse. Teaching students about optimism can help them see unpleasant events as learning opportunities.聽

Teaching realistic optimism

The term negativity bias refers to a human brain鈥檚 attunement to negative, unpleasant events. At the end of a school day, if a teacher is focused on the singular instance that did not go so well compared with the many events that did go well, they are exhibiting this bias. Modeling optimism is the best way to combat negativity bias, but there聽are several other things a teacher can do as well.

Positive reframing. Challenge students to seek positive ways of evaluating an event. A student who failed to win in the spelling bee may feel let down. Capitalize on this opportunity by promoting the perspective that contest participation is actually great preparation for better future performance. Any failure or unpleasant event can be reframed as a positive, or, as the famous quote says, 鈥渁n opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently.鈥

Selective focus. Teach students to focus primarily on thoughts and events that lead to action-oriented solutions. I remember a time when I was teaching a lesson and the electricity went out. I was so disappointed because I had prepared a great lesson that it seemed would not happen. As I was inwardly bemoaning this unkind fate, I looked outside.聽It was a beautiful day. I asked my students to drag their chairs outside, and we conducted the lesson underneath a big tree. It turned out to be a memorable day and a positive learning experience.

Averting catastrophizing. Do you have students who are able to arrive at the worst possible conclusion for a negative event? A student who receives a B in middle school math declares she won鈥檛 be able to go to the university of her choice. This is called catastrophization聽or unproductive self-talk. Educators can dole out empathy first, then help the student get unstuck by finding proactive, little steps to solve the problem. 聽

鲍蝉颈苍驳听丑耻尘辞谤. Humor can be a great antidote to聽the negativity bias. There was a time when I taught a science lesson incorrectly and it took me 30 minutes to realize the error. I did an exaggerated shrug, looked at my class, and began erasing everything. I humbly admitted that I was wrong, apologized, and then asked, 鈥淎ren鈥檛 you glad I鈥檓 not a plastic surgeon?鈥 My students laughed, and no one complained! Humor is a good strategy to help arrest rumination in its tracks. Allow laughter to take the sting out of a failure. Often, the worst possible scenario is laughably ludicrous. 聽

Teaching an optimistic explanatory style. The negativity bias is associated with a pessimistic explanatory style, or the way an individual explains the reason for an event. Psychologist Martin Seligman describes how individuals differ in their explanatory styles across three dimensions:聽

  • Personalization: Is the cause perceived to be internal or external?
  • Permanence: Is the event specific (a one-time event) or eternal?
  • Pervasiveness: Is the event applicable only to a specific situation, or is it global?

Teach students to examine common negative narratives with an optimistic explanatory style. A student who fails a math test may say, 鈥淚鈥檓 bad at math.鈥 In contrast, a聽student聽with a more optimistic explanatory style聽may engage in the self-talk in this pattern:聽

  • Personalization: 鈥淚 didn鈥檛 study鈥攖hat鈥檚聽why I failed the test.鈥
  • Permanence: 鈥淭his is just the first test. I have to work聽on practice problems every day. I鈥檒l ace that second test!鈥
  • Pervasiveness: 鈥淚鈥檓 doing well in other subjects!鈥

A student manifesting learned helplessness will adopt an attribution that is internal, eternal, and global. This explanatory style can manifest in early childhood. Because self-talk often becomes automatic and habitual, there should be a place for teaching optimism in the classroom. 聽

Teachers also need to practice optimistic explanatory thinking. For example, at the end of a poorly executed lesson a teacher may lament, 鈥淭his always happens.聽I鈥檒l definitely get a poor evaluation.鈥 Using a more optimistic explanatory style, the same teacher might think, 鈥淭hat didn鈥檛 go as well as I had hoped for.聽I鈥檒l find a better way of presenting this topic.鈥

Share This Story

  • email icon

Filed Under

  • Social & Emotional Learning (SEL)

Follow 麻豆传媒入口

麻豆传媒入口 is an initiative of the 麻豆传媒入口.
麻豆传媒入口庐, the EDU Logo鈩 and Lucas Education Research Logo庐 are trademarks or registered trademarks of the 麻豆传媒入口 in the U.S. and other countries.